A = Adoption versus Anti-Matter

When it comes to sustaining and fostering an atmosphere supportive and encouraging of the legally establishbed process of adoption, what matters to which person regarding a matter of the most personal nature, beginning with the biological sources of the creation of a living being and then the subsequent decision to either proceed in the role of full-time parent or no parent at all - as well as every other spot on the spectrum of parenting in between those two options - the idea of paperwork being the ties that permanently bind a family together has meritous and altruistic purpose...but only if those who are outside of the circumstances opt into such a sales pitch.

With cliches tied into childhood cruelty being both offense and defense, what if some of the tensions are being driven by those in the positions able to influence a wide variety of elements associated with the adoption process, including but not limited to the pursuit of opening one's records, let alone those who continue to turn up empty handed time and time again while pursuing information regarding a biological relative - at the request of the adoptee or the biological parent - and at the cost and expense of the person searching for another piece of possible truth about the origin of one's existence, such as those who promise to find relatives for a fee...and turn up empty-handed time and time again.

With challenge on the shoulders of those who subscribe to parenting philosophies other than the more traditional, issues associated with single parenting as well as same-sex parents forces the topic of adoption to continue to be battered and bruised as one of the many social instruments to fulfill ideals and obligations such as a generic "public" acting in the "best interest of a child" by sustaining laws governing such a process in the first place.

So if adoption doesn't matter to someone, does that mean that they are anti-adoption...or is the term adoption more a subject of semantics and its subsequent application?

And perhaps I am the one who does not understand the concept of adoption, since it is also used in the context of adding a new law to a collection of laws?